This website best viewed at 1024 x 768 minimum screen resolution

 

Home  Preparedness   The Mayflower  Go Navy  Education  Photography  Videos  Our World   Computers

"Avoiding SPAM in your Email Diet"

 By:  William P. Flinn, (C) 1998, Updated 2005

 

I wanted to take a departure from talking about computer hardware with this article, by discussing something which has become just as annoying and time consuming as any hardware malfunction. One of the fastest growing problems with using computer email these days is all the darn unsolicited commercial email known as "SPAM" which is sent to your email address. SPAM is the name given to that endless stream of junk mail you get every time you post to a news group, or visit a site which remembers your e-mail address. Telemarketers and scam artists are taking advantage of the fact that they can advertise free of charge, leaving you to pay the bill and bear the burden for their advertising efforts.  Worse yet, many of these bogus messages are attempting to get you to visit a web site or open an attachment, leading to identity theft and other types of attacks on you and your computer.

Time is valuable to most people, and sifting through many useless messages to find the one or two legitimate messages is causing a huge waste of our valuable time. Some years ago, a similar, unethical practice was performed. This was done by sending unsolicited commercial messages to user's FAX machines, but laws were passed to prohibit this practice because it shifted the expense and burden of advertising to the consumer, rather than to the advertiser, where the expense belonged. Since the popularity of email has increased dramatically, it is now popular practice to bombard the airwaves with useless advertising email, many times obtaining addresses from unsuspecting visitors to USENET news groups or various web sites. There are several methods which are in use today by various telemarketers, including "bots" which scour the Usenet groups and web sites, stripping off email addresses to send to, as well as sites which set "cookies", or collect personal information by making you submit to online surveys.

 

Posting to News Groups:

When you post to a news group, some of these telemarketing agencies and scammers are using programs to collect email addresses. This is possible because most users who post to news groups have included their email addresses, embedded in headers, which are therefore harvested from the postings and compiled into a large database to be used later. When you set your preferences in your email program or web browser, you usually include such things as your identity and your return email address. This information is placed in the header of any messages or news group postings you send, and can then be gathered by the so called "bot" programs.

One simple way to avoid these useless junk e-mailings is to just change the return address in your preferences. For instance, if John Smith, who uses comcast.net for his email service, were setting up his preferences, in the return address line, he might simply put jsmith@comcast.net. To avoid having his email return address collected by potential spammers, john might disguise (or what we geeks call "munge") his email address by either changing it to jsmith@NOcomcast.netSPAM, or by changing it to something else entirely different. This way, when the email bot is stripping off your email replay address to use later, it is taking a false address, which will be non-deliverable.  Notice also, that when the fake email address was created, the domain name was changed to something different.  If you change the username, but still specify a valid domain name, you are going to make some ISP a little angry with you, because they still have to deal with all of the email traffic, even the bogus pieces.  The danger there also is to make sure that people who will email you legitimately know what your real email address is, and can ensure that is properly entered in the "TO:" field when replying to your email messages. A safe way to do this is to simply state at the bottom of the message to remove the "NO" and "SPAM" from the email address before replying to it. These email "bots" usually only strip off information from the header, they do not get this information from the text body of the message, and therefore won't know what your real email address is.

 

Using Email Filters:

Email filters are also useful in getting rid of unwanted email. Most newer email programs include a filtering feature which allows the user to specify certain email contents which can be identified, and cause the email to be sent to the "trash" folder automatically. For example, a common subject for a telemarketing scam might read "Make $$$ Now in Your Spare Time" in the subject field. By setting up your filter to identify all messages containing "$" in the subject, these messages can be automatically routed to your trash folder for deletion. Some mass e-mailers in California are now having to comply with a state regulation which requires them to put the letters "ADV:" or "AD:" in the subject line. By identifying all messages with ADV: in the subject line for filtering, the junk messages can be filtered out.

One unusual method of SPAM (and I still haven't figured out why they do it) is to send a blank email with no subject, no message, and no return address.  An attempt to discover valid email addresses?  I haven't a clue, but it is a rampant problem.  That's where my email filters have really saved me.  I wrote rules telling my email filters that if a message comes in with a valid "from" address (meaning name@emaildomain.com) it will have the "@" symbol somewhere in there.  If it does, my email rules do not get processed any further.  The next rule tells the filter to delete ALL email.  Sounds scary, but it isn't.  Simply put, if the email is form a valid source, the filter keeps it.  If it is blank it gets trashed.  So what about all the junk that has the proper "@" symbol in the address?  My follow on rules deal with those appropriately.

 

Disposable Email Addresses:

Finally, a fairly reliable way to fool telemarketers is to use a "disposable" email address as a clearing house for all your email. To be really effective, look for one of the many free email services, such as Hotmail or Excite, which has a filtering option. Many of these services have a well defined database of known spammers, and can filter them automatically for you, as well as let you add your own filters to protect against these suspected SPAM e-mailers. Many even offer to directly forward your email to your real email address. You would set up your identity in your email program to specify your disposable address. When bogus spam email is sent to you, it is filtered out automatically, and the email service only forwards legitimate emails to you. Again, you will want to make sure that your friends and associates know your real email address, or at least how to reply to you through your disposable address.

 

Wrapping It Up:

SPAM email is clogging the Internet, and eating up our bandwidth. The most effective thing we can do as an online community is to attack this time wasting practice and let our elected representatives know how we feel about it. By enacting laws which prosecute the people who are advertising at our expense, wasting our time and stealing our identities, we can all enjoy our Internet services better, and not spend so much time dealing with this junk mail which floods into our email boxes every day. Even if laws are enacted, however, the sad reality is that catching and prosecuting these buffoons will be impossible.  So we fight back by making them waste their resources on messages that go nowhere or get automatically deleted when they get to us. To find out more about dealing with spam email, visit The Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email (CAUCE) at http://www.cauce.org/

 

###

 

 


"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."

                                    
- Second Amendment, U.S. Constitution

 


"The difference between Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama: Rugged individualism versus social elitism.  You decide which one was which." 
- wpf
 

 

 

 


This is a McAfee "SafeSite" Rated Web Page
Get McAfee SiteAdvisor

Gonzo's Garage  ©2010

 

 

W3Counter Web Stats

(View Counter Statistics Here) 

Anti Spam